Home
Council on Energy, Environment and Water Integrated | International | Independent

Acting on Many FrontsIncentives and Regulations to Phase-down HFCs in India

, , ,
March 2019 |

Citation: Shikha Bhasin, Apurupa Gorthi, Vaibhav Chaturvedi, and Torgrim Asphjell (2019) 'Acting on Many Fronts: Incentives and Regulations to Phase-down HFCs in India', February

Overview

This report provides insights on creating an ecosystem for India's successful transition away from hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), maps the global regulatory options that could be adopted, and emphasises on the need for policy certainty. The report, published in collaboration with the Norwegian Environment Agency, is based on in-depth interviews with more than 60 industry stakeholders including primary refrigerant consumers, refrigerant manufacturers and suppliers, component manufacturers and suppliers, industry association representatives, and commercial users of products

As part of the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, 197 countries committed to lower consumption and production of HFCs with high global warming potential (GWP). Under the Kigali deal, India agreed to curtail its HFC emissions by 85 per cent before 2047.

Sectoral mix of industry stakeholders interviewed

Source: CEEW compilation, 2019

How can India successfully transition away from HFCs?

  • Focus on policy certainty
    Policy certainty is key to realising India’s international commitments to phasing down HFCs. This will help create supply-chain readiness and encourage extensive investments that are necessary.
  • Impose a medium-term upper limit on GWPs
    Almost 70 per cent of the stakeholders we interviewed found this to be the most impactful and preferred policy choice for India. This entails imposing a GWP limit on refrigerants for each specific application, based on the two or three lowest GWPs existing in the market for each application or equipment. This would be supported by a financial incentive to the end user who will receive a rebate on the price of low-GWP products.

Source: Satish Kumar

  • Meticulous checks at each level of transition
    It is critical to have regular checks in the implementation of a refrigerant-focused policy for a successful HFC phase-down in India. These include institutionalising measurement, review, and verification (MRV); controlling stockpiling, and regulating the availability and pricing of refrigerants to avoid market manipulation.
  • Foster awareness about refrigerant transition
    This will play an essential role for all stakeholders involved in the process - for consumers to change their purchasing behaviour and demand, for industry to prepare for the impending refrigerant transition, and service sector technicians to ensure safety and maintenance.
  • Formulate policies supporting HFC phase-down
    Policies that support domestic competitiveness in manufacturing and in R&D, to subsequently limit reliance on non-certified and imported components and products would support India’s HFC phase-down strategy.
Almost 70 per cent of the stakeholders we interviewed found imposing a medium-term upper limit on GWPs to be the most impactful and preferred policy choice for India.

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

Evolving Indian Environmental Policy as a Context for the Governance of Climate ChangeLecture delivered at CEEW-InSIS Conference on Climate Geoengineering Governance


June 2014 |

Citation: J M Mauskar (2014) ‘Evolving Indian Environmental Policy as a Context for the Governance of Climate Change’ at the Conference on Climate Geoengineering Governance, New Delhi, 23-24 June

Overview

J M Mauskar delivered a lecture ‘Evolving Indian Environmental Policy as a Context for the Governance of Climate Change’ at the Conference on Climate Geoengineering Governance organised by the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) and Institute for Science, Innovation and Society (InSIS), University of Oxford on 23-24 June 2014 in New Delhi.

In his lecture, J M Mauskar said, “The Indian stance in my mind, whichever government is in power, will be based on equity. This is what our Constitution says and what our religious documents say too. Governments will not be able to ignore equity. I don’t just mean inter-generational equity but also intra-generational equity. Primacy of the UNFCCC is something which all developing countries have been vocalising. The forum-hunting for various issues (maritime organisations, the Montreal protocol) will find lots of resistance. The principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibility (CBDR) is the keystone for UNFCCC negotiations, and even the Indian Constitution recognises that there are weaker sections that have to be taken care of.”

Key Highlights

  • In 1950, when the Indian Constitution was adopted, Sustainable Development, was an uncommon phrase. However, there was a directive principle that stated that material resources had to be distributed for the common good. This embodies the concept of sustainable development.
  • India had the Water Prevention & Control of Pollution Act in 1974 and a similar act for air in 1981. IN 1984, the Bhopal Gas tragedy occurred and neither of these acts could have prevented it. So, the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) was promulgated in 1986, marking a shift in approach from controlling pollution to protecting the environment.
  • The fourth assessment report from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was a landmark in climate affairs. India, for the first time, framed its National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC), having several missions under it including Solar Mission, the Energy Efficiency Mission, the Habitat Mission, the Water Mission etc.
  • Steps towards implementation of state climate action plans has seen some resistance. At the state level, there is focus on adaptation strategies as it is driven by local needs and is implemented locally. While mitigation and energy policies are national priorities and implementation happens at the state government level.
  • Between adaptation and mitigation, adaptation is our first priority, but in the future, more money and resources will have to be devoted towards mitigation as the uncertainties about climate change impacts reduce.
  • There is another fear that Solar Radiation Management (SRM) should not undercut the efforts of the UNFCCC. Geoengineering regimes should not be applied through principles different from those in the convention viz. CBDR and equity. Geoengineering is sought to be applied under different principles and although the Oxford Principles are sound, the point they make about governance coming before deployment is important.

The conference aimed to examine the governance arrangements that may be needed to ensure that experimentation or deployment of any of the large range of geoengineering techniques being proposed are safe, fair, effective and economic.

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

Facing the oil headwinds head on

Geoengineering must be transparent to gain public trust

Climate Deals Need Effective Institutions; Climate Response Needs Practical Tools

Changing the course of the planet

Four negotiations, no funeral (yet)

Why the global clampdown on hazardous refrigerants hasn't been effective

An unsettled political economy

Energy security, not independence

Pages