Home
Council on Energy, Environment and Water Integrated | International | Independent
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Maharashtra State Climate Finance Framework
From Risk to Resilience
16 September, 2026 | Climate Resilience
Yash Kadam, Srajan Mishra and Dr Pushp Bajaj

Suggested Citation: Maharashtra Institution for Transformation (MITRA), Government of Maharashtra, and Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW). 2026. Maharashtra State Climate Finance Framework: From Risk to Resilience. Mumbai: Department of Environment and Climate Change, Government of Maharashtra.

Overview

Maharashtra stands at a critical juncture. On the one hand, its economic growth is accelerating; on the other, climate risks are escalating, affecting livelihoods, public health, critical infrastructure, and economic output. The two are becoming increasingly intertwined. As one of India's most economically dynamic states, Maharashtra is simultaneously among the most exposed to climate-related hazards, including floods, droughts, heat stress, cyclones and coastal erosion.

Through the Viksit Maharashtra 2047 vision and the updated Maharashtra State Action Plan on Climate Change: Pathways for 2030 (MH SAPCC), the Government of Maharashtra has articulated a clear commitment to climate-resilient and low-carbon development. Translating these ambitions into measurable outcomes depends on the state's ability to systematically align public expenditure and private investment with targeted climate action. At present, climate-relevant investments remain dispersed across departments, schemes and budget lines, without a consistent method to assess their contribution — and without clear signals on eligible activities, investors and financial institutions struggle to identify and appraise climate-aligned opportunities.

The Maharashtra State Climate Finance Framework (MSCFF) responds by presenting a state-level climate finance taxonomy — a structured, science-based decision tool to identify, classify and screen climate-aligned interventions across mitigation, adaptation and cross-cutting action. It is designed as a living document that will be updated as India's Climate Finance Taxonomy is finalised and notified.

By operationalising the priorities of the MH SAPCC and aligning them with the Viksit Maharashtra 2047 vision, the MSCFF strengthens the link between risk-informed planning and the channelling of investment towards sustainability.

The framework was developed under the guidance of the Department of Environment and Climate Change, Government of Maharashtra, the Maharashtra State Climate Action Cell (MahaSCAC) and the Maharashtra Institution for Transformation (MITRA), with CEEW as knowledge partner, and with support from the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), British High Commission.

Key Highlights

  • Climate risk in Maharashtra is systemic, not episodic. CEEW analysis finds 34 of 36 districts exposed to extreme climate events, and 25 per cent of districts showing a swapping trend between flood and drought exposure — requiring risk-informed investment rather than reactive disaster response.
  • Adaptation dominates the state's climate budget but not its capital flows. Nearly 80 per cent of the proposed climate budget under MH SAPCC is adaptation, the segment that attracts the least private capital — making a dedicated screening pathway for adaptation central to the framework.
  • The framework is built for use at both ends of the investment cycle. Upstream, for strategic planning, pipeline development, climate-responsive budgeting and investment signalling; downstream, for budget tagging, expenditure tracking, impact monitoring and disclosure.
  • Four technical screening criteria determine what qualifies: substantial contribution, intentionality and additionality, do no significant harm, and equity and inclusion. Climate outcomes must be the purpose of an activity rather than a by-product.
  • It is an early sub-national application of a taxonomy-based approach in India, interoperable with India's Draft Climate Finance Taxonomy and international standards, and designed as a living document that will be updated as the national taxonomy is notified.

Have a query?

author image
Senior Programme Lead
"Maharashtra has set out a clear commitment to scale up climate spending. The harder question is what that money should buy. The MSCFF gives the state and its investors a common, science-based language for answering that — one that distinguishes genuine climate action from business-as-usual spending, screens out interventions that simply shift risk elsewhere, and asks who actually gains protection. That is what makes climate finance credible, and credibility is what unlocks capital at scale."

Executive summary

Maharashtra stands at a critical juncture. On the one hand, its economic growth is accelerating, while on the other, climate risks are escalating, impacting livelihoods, public health, critical infrastructure and economic output. And both are becoming increasingly intertwined. As one of India’s most economically dynamic states, Maharashtra is simultaneously among the most exposed to climate-related hazards, including floods, droughts, heat stress, cyclones, and coastal erosion.

These risks threaten infrastructure, livelihoods, fiscal stability, and long-term development outcomes, particularly in climate-sensitive sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, and urban infrastructure. Addressing these challenges requires stronger policies, coupled with a decisive, forward-looking approach on how financial resources are mobilised and utilised.

Through the Viksit Maharashtra 2047 vision and the updated Maharashtra State Action Plan on Climate Change: Pathways for 2030 (MH SAPCC), the Government of Maharashtra has articulated a clear commitment to climate-resilient and lowcarbon development. Translating these ambitions into measurable outcomes depends on the state’s ability to systematically align public expenditure and private investment with targeted climate action. Mobilising domestic and international capital alongside streamlining public finance has emerged as a strategic priority for the Government of Maharashtra, as embedded in the MH SAPCC. However, the absence of a clear and credible framework to define what constitutes a climate-aligned activity limits investors and financial institutions from identifying eligible projects, assessing climate impact, and aligning investments with state priorities. Existing budget allocation for climate-focussed activities remains fragmented across departments, as they are often without a consistent methodology to assess their contribution to climate mitigation and adaptation or resilience.

The Maharashtra State Climate Finance Framework (MSCFF) responds to these challenges by presenting a state-level climate finance taxonomy that is aligned with Maharashtra’s sustainable developmental goals and climate risks. The framework serves as a decision-making tool to categorise climate change mitigation, adaptation, and cross-cutting activities, and links them with the sectoral strategies embedded under the MH SAPCC. Furthermore, it establishes a structured, sciencebased ‘common language’ to identify, classify, and screen climate-focussed interventions. The framework ensures that it is interoperable with Indian and global climate taxonomies, and enables decision-makers to move from reactive spending towards a more strategic, outcome-oriented deployment of capital. The framework will enable planners to move from fragmented spending to a structured, pipeline-driven approach, which signals investor-ready opportunities, and strengthens access to domestic and international climate finance.

By operationalising the priorities of the MH SAPCC and aligning them with the Viksit Maharashtra 2047 vision, the MSCFF strengthens the link between risk-informed planning and channelling investment towards sustainability. Ultimately, the framework supports Maharashtra’s transition towards a lowcarbon, climate-resilient development pathway; one that safeguards economic growth, protects vulnerable communities, and ensures long-term sustainability in the face of escalating climatic uncertainties.

Key definitions

Climate adaptation, as defined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, is the process of adjusting ecological, social, and economic systems to respond to actual or expected climate impacts, aiming to moderate potential damage or capitalise on new opportunities. It is a context-specific approach that focuses on building resilience through infrastructure, policy changes, and community-led solutions, to protect lives and livelihoods (UNFCCC 2025).

Climate mitigation involves reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing natural carbon sinks, to address the root causes of global warming and preserve a stable biosphere. This goal is achieved through transitioning to renewable energy, restoring ecosystems like forests and wetlands, and implementing supportive policies such as carbon pricing and emission limits (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2022).

Climate finance as defined by the UNFCCC Standing Committee on Finance aims at reducing emissions and enhancing sinks of greenhouse gases, reducing vulnerability, increasing adaptive capacity, and mainstreaming and increasing resilience of human and ecological systems to negative climate impacts. It includes financing for actions identified in a country’s nationally determined contribution, adaptation communication, national adaptation plan, long-term low-emission development strategy or other national plan for implementing and achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement and the objective of the Convention (UNFCCC 2026).

Sustainable finance refers to finance flows, policies and institutional frameworks that support longterm sustainable development. It incorporates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) frameworks into decision-making to ensure economic growth, social inclusion and stewardship. (OECD 2024).

Adaptation finance refers to funding directed at building resilience to climate change impacts, from flood-resistant infrastructure to drought-resilient agriculture, early warning systems, and risk-transfer mechanisms like insurance. (UNEP FI 2025)

Mitigation finance is financial support provided for activities and interventions that contribute to the reduction, limitation, or avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions, or the enhancement of sinks (Common Principles for Climate Mitigation Finance Tracking, 2023).

Maladaptation is the risk of an unintended measurable increase in vulnerability (or exposure) in the investment context, and/or in the wider system, within which the investment is situated (Climate Bonds Initiative 2024).

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the Maharashtra State Climate Finance Framework?

    The Maharashtra State Climate Finance Framework (MSCFF) is a state-level climate finance taxonomy developed by MITRA, the Government of Maharashtra and CEEW. It helps government departments, investors, and financial institutions identify, classify, and screen climate-aligned investments across mitigation, adaptation, and cross-cutting activities. Aligned with the Maharashtra State Action Plan on Climate Change and India's Draft Climate Finance Taxonomy, it applies four screening criteria to ensure credible, measurable climate outcomes.

  • Who can use the framework, and how?

    Four user groups. Governments can identify climate-aligned interventions, develop project pipelines, structure green and sustainability-linked bonds, and conduct climate-responsive budgeting. Financial institutions can design lending products, concessional loans, and blended instruments. Companies can align ESG metrics and identify climate-aligned projects. Asset managers can identify transition activities and investment opportunities in climate and resilience, and strengthen the link between financial flows and decarbonisation.

  • How does the MSCFF decide whether an activity qualifies as climate-aligned?

    Every activity is screened against four technical criteria. Substantial contribution requires a demonstrable causal link to emissions reduced or climate risk lowered, rather than an incidental co-benefit. Intentionality and additionality require the climate outcome to be an explicit objective delivering benefits beyond business-as-usual. Do no significant harm screens for maladaptation and negative spillovers. Equity and inclusion assess distributional impacts on vulnerable and high-risk populations.

  • How is the MSCFF different from India's Climate Finance Taxonomy?

    They are complementary. India's draft national taxonomy sets overarching principles, definitions, and screening logic. The MSCFF translates these to the state level as sector-specific classifications, activity-level screening criteria and investment pathways that reflect Maharashtra's own climate risks, development priorities and institutional arrangements. It is designed to be reviewed and updated once the national taxonomy is formally notified, keeping state and national definitions coherent.

  • Why does the framework place particular emphasis on adaptation?

    Adaptation accounts for nearly 80 per cent of Maharashtra's proposed climate budget, but attracts the least private capital of any category of climate finance — benefits are hard to quantify, gestation periods are long, and stable revenue streams are rare. The MSCFF gives adaptation a dedicated four-step screening pathway, with explicit safeguards against maladaptation, so that adaptation investments can be assessed with the same rigour as mitigation.

  • Is the MSCFF a final document?

    No. It is explicitly designed as a living document. It will be periodically reviewed and updated to reflect India's Climate Finance Taxonomy once notified, as well as emerging evidence, lessons from implementation and evolving international best practice. Governance arrangements for operationalising the framework will be determined in consultation with departments of the Government of Maharashtra, MITRA and technical partners.

  •  

Have a query?

author image
Senior Programme Lead

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

Explore Related Publications