Home
Council on Energy, Environment and Water Integrated | International | Independent
REPORT
Mainstreaming Decentralised Green Hydrogen in India:
Compendium of Industrial, Commercial and Remote-Area Applications
11 September, 2024 | Industrial Sustainability
Hashvitha Rajakumaran, Hemant Prakash Singh, Karan Kothadiya, and Deepak Yadav

Suggested Citation: Rajakumaran, Hashvitha, Hemant Prakash Singh, Karan Kothadiya, Deepak Yadav. 2024. Mainstreaming Decentralised Green Hydrogen Applications in India: Compendium of Industrial, Commercial and Remote-Area Applications. New Delhi: Council of Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW).

Overview

This report explores the role of decentralised green hydrogen systems in India's energy transition. Green hydrogen, produced through water electrolysis using renewable energy, is a clean energy carrier that presents versatile use cases as a feedstock, fuel, and energy carrier in decarbonising hard-to-abate sectors. Decentralised green hydrogen systems involve producing and using green hydrogen near the point of consumption, eliminating the need for transportation or transmission of renewable energy required for its production.

The report explains the differences between centralised and decentralised hydrogen systems and presents the unique advantages of decentralised green hydrogen systems in potential applications. In the industrial sector, we look at decentralised green hydrogen used for metallurgical processing, glassmaking, hydrogen peroxide production, thermal power production, food processing, chemicals and pharmaceuticals, and semiconductor manufacturing. Furthermore, the report profiles commercial and remote-area applications such as using green hydrogen as a cooking fuel, fuel for heavy machinery, backup power source in telecom towers, energy source powering microgrids, and military applications.

The report presents an estimated potential green hydrogen demand in these applications with a transition to green hydrogen from conventional fuels and commodities, the associated emission reduction potential, and the potential reduction in import expenditure. It also presents a breakeven green hydrogen cost at which green hydrogen becomes viable against conventional fuel and commodities in each application.

Key Findings

  • Decentralised green hydrogen systems provide a continuous, reliable, and convenient off-grid energy supply with higher energy efficiencies than most conventional energy sources in the applications considered. They could also significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve air quality, reduce expenditure on imported fossil fuels, and reduce transmission and distribution losses.
  • Decentralised green hydrogen applications could lead to a potential green hydrogen demand of around 19 MTPA, primarily in commercial and remote-area applications. Using green hydrogen as cooking fuel could constitute up to 95 per cent of the total potential demand.
  • In certain applications, such as backup power in telecom towers, glass manufacturing, hydrogen peroxide production, and cooling in thermal power plants, decentralised green hydrogen is viable even at current production costs, which range between USD 3.5 and 5 per kg.
  • A complete adoption of green hydrogen in the evaluated applications could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 221 MTPA, primarily in commercial and remote-area applications.
  • Industrial applications have a higher specific emissions mitigation potential with green hydrogen than commercial and remote areas, but their lower potential green hydrogen demand could limit their overall impact.

HAVE A QUERY?

“Decentralised green hydrogen systems are well-positioned to serve multiple use cases, offering unique application-specific advantages, in addition to decarbonising the applications. The economic, technological and operational barriers to safe and scalable deployment of decentralised green hydrogen could be overcome with focused policy support.”

Executive  summary

Green hydrogen, produced through water electrolysis using renewable energy (RE), is a clean energy carrier that has versatile uses, including as a feedstock, fuel, and energy carrier, in decarbonising hard-to-abate sectors. In decentralised green hydrogen systems, the production and use of green hydrogen are near the point of consumption, eliminating the need to transport it or transmit the RE required to produce it.

We find that unconventional decentralised green hydrogen applications in industries such as metallurgical processing, glass making, thermal power production, food processing, chemicals and pharmaceuticals, and semiconductor manufacturing could be already economically viable or close to viability. Furthermore, we find that applications in commercial and remote-area settings, such as its use as a cooking fuel, fuel for heavy machinery, a backup power source in telecom towers, and an energy source powering microgrids and military applications, could contribute to a substantial potential demand for green hydrogen in India, comparable to that for larger, more conventional green hydrogen applications, such as in the fertiliser, refining, and steel industries and long-haul heavy-duty road transportation. We present the use cases for green hydrogen in these applications in Figure ES1.

Figure ES1: Use cases of decentralised green hydrogen systems


Source: Authors’ analysis

In this report, we explore the unique advantages that decentralised green hydrogen systems offer and also discuss the challenges and constraints that they impose on producers and consumers. We quantify the potential demand for green hydrogen in India that would arise through these decentralised applications, the associated emissions mitigation potential, the breakeven cost of green hydrogen to compete against conventional fuels and commodities that it will replace, and the potential reduction in import expenditure with a transition to green hydrogen.

Beyond their ability to decarbonise applications, decentralised green hydrogen systems also offer several unique advantages:

  • A continuous, reliable, and convenient off-grid energy supply: With decentralised green hydrogen systems, individuals and communities can take control of their energy supply, preventing disruptions and operational bottlenecks in their supply chains. This can be particularly useful in remote, inaccessible areas.
  • Higher energy efficiencies are seen with the use of fuel cells and hydrogen-based technologies as compared to conventional diesel or biomass-based technologies.
  • The inherently higher purity of green hydrogen compared to fossil-derived hydrogen is useful in industrial applications, to avoid contaminants and maintain process efficiencies.
  • Improvement in local air quality is seen with a shift away from polluting fuels such as biomass and diesel to hydrogen-based cookstoves, microgrids, and heavy machinery.
  • Reduced transmission and distribution losses and associated costs result in improved energy efficiency.
  • Reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of up to 221 million metric tonnes per annum (MTPA) could be achieved with a complete transition to green hydrogen in the applications considered in this report, by our estimates. Green hydrogen use in cooking would account for around 209 MTPA of the total emissions mitigation potential due to the comparatively larger potential demand for it in this sector.
  • Reduction in energy import expenditure of up to INR 1.2 lakh crore (around USD 15.3 billion) per year could be achieved by completely phasing out imported fuels such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), and diesel, per our estimates.

In addition, we present certain application-specific advantages that decentralised green hydrogen systems offer Table ES1.

Table ES1: Unique application-specific advantages offered by decentralised green hydrogen systems

Key estimation findings

We observe that the potential demand for green hydrogen is much higher in commercial and remote-area applications than in industrial applications. However, the lower break-even cost of most of these applications signifies a lack of economic viability.

We group the applications into four categories, as denoted in Figure ES2, assuming a demand potential higher than 100 kilo metric tonnes per annum (KTPA) to be large and a break-even cost higher than USD 5 per kg to be economical. The estimation results are as follows:

  • Low-hanging fruit: Backup power provision in telecom towers is found to be the only economical application, with a break-even cost of USD 5.1 per kg and a large potential demand for green hydrogen of around 257 KTPA.
  • Promising: Other commercial applications – cooking fuel and fuel for heavy machinery – have a larger potential green hydrogen demand of 18.1 MTPA and 650 KTPA, respectively, but the break-even cost ranges between USD 1.0 per kg and USD 3.7 per kg. These applications are termed promising because a trajectory of reducing green hydrogen costs could mean that they would become economically viable eventually.
  • Practically viable: Hydrogen peroxide production and glassmaking have the highest break-even cost, ranging between USD 8 and USD 12 per kg, but the potential green hydrogen demand, at around 10.1 KTPA and 8.4 KTPA respectively, is much smaller than that for other applications.
  • Limited: Metallurgical processing and thermal power plant cooling applications also have a small potential demand of around 9.5 KTPA and 0.4 KTPA, respectively. While they are near economic viability, with an estimated break-even green hydrogen cost of USD 3.2 per kg and USD 3.5 per kg, respectively, the overall impact of the transition to green hydrogen in this sector will be limited.

Figure ES2: Most commercial applications have a high potential demand for green hydrogen but are currently uneconomical


Source: Authors’ analysis

By our estimates, a complete transition to green hydrogen in the applications considered in this report could reduce GHG emissions by up to 221 MTPA. Green hydrogen use in cooking would account for around 209 MTPA of the total emissions mitigation potential due to high demand in this sector. We find that industrial applications have a higher specific emissions mitigation potential associated with a green hydrogen transition than commercial and remote-area applications, albeit with a lower overall emissions mitigation potential due to correspondingly lower potential demand for green hydrogen. Metallurgical processing and cooling in thermal power plants are the outliers, with extremely high specific emissions mitigation potentials of around 65 kg-carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2eq.) per kg-H2 and 46.4 kg-CO2eq. per kg-H2 , respectively. All other applications fall in the range of 10 kg-CO2eq. per kg-H2 to 20 kg-CO2eq. per kg-H2 . It may be interesting to note that the difference in energy efficiencies of PNG, LPG, and biomass used as cooking fuels translates to a difference in the specific emissions mitigation of around 13 kg-CO2eq. per kg-H2 between the three fuels.

Policy recommendations

We find that decentralised green hydrogen systems are well positioned to serve multiple use-cases, offering unique application-specific advantages, in addition to decarbonising the applications. The economic, technological, and operational barriers to safe and scalable deployment of decentralised green hydrogen are common to most use cases. We outline the following policy recommendations to overcome these barriers:

  • Low-cost financing: The high upfront investment required for decentralised green hydrogen applications is a common impediment, even in instances where they could be viable in the long run. Devising a financing programme for this, on lines similar to those of the PM – Surya Ghar: Muft Bijli Yojana could help overcome this barrier.
  • Implement green public procurement strategies: The government could preferentially procure green hydrogen–based systems in its undertakings – such as for heavy machinery for mining, construction, and manufacturing; hydrogen-based cookstoves and green hydrogen fuel for kitchens in government buildings and microgrids; and green hydrogen–operated devices for use in military operations – which would increase the demand and lead to consequent innovation on the part of suppliers in the ecosystem.
  • Explore biological green hydrogen production routes: This can be done in applications that can leverage their organic waste streams to produce green hydrogen at low costs. The waste generated by the food-processing industry and the wet waste from residential communities could be utilised to produce and consume green hydrogen locally.
  • Utilisation of government land parcels for green hydrogen production: The large land parcels available with government-controlled entities such as the armed forces, the public-sector industries, Indian Railways, and so on could be used for RE generation to produce and consume green hydrogen in a decentralised manner.
  • Strategic research and development (R&D) in military applications: The defence research agencies in India could undertake special projects aimed at indigenising hydrogen-based military applications in consultation with the divisions of the armed forces operating in remote, inaccessible regions.
  • Budgeting a dedicated R&D allocation: Allocating funds for research and pilot projects in decentralised green hydrogen applications will enable innovators building these technologies to access seed capital for their projects.
  • Develop safety standards: While general safety standards for hydrogen production, storage, and use are in place, it is crucial to develop and enforce specific regulations tailored to various decentralised hydrogen applications, especially the consumer-focused ones.
  • Awareness building: The government could organise exhibitions, trade shows, and demonstrations for the benefit of consumers to build awareness about the benefits and share the know-how regarding technology related to decentralised hydrogen applications.

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

Explore Related Publications