Council on Energy, Environment and Water Integrated | International | Independent

Powering Agriculture in India

Strategies to Boost Components A and C Under PM-KUSUM Scheme

Anas Rahman, Shalu Agrawal, Abhishek Jain
August 2021 | Low-carbon Economy

Suggested citation: Rahman, Anas, Shalu Agrawal, and Abhishek Jain. 2021. Powering Agriculture in India: Strategies to Boost Components A & C Under PM-KUSUM Scheme. New Delhi: Council on Energy, Environment and Water.


This study intends to help unlock the potential of two solarisation models - solarisation of rural electricity feeders and solarisation of individual grid-connected pumps - to power India’s irrigation needs. These two models are promoted under components A and C of the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Urja Suraksha evam Uthhan Mahabhiyan (PM-KUSUM) scheme launched by the Government of India in 2019. However, these components have seen only a few takers among the states and power distribution companies (discoms). Based on in-depth consultations with representatives of discoms, state nodal agencies of renewable energy, and private developers and manufacturers across seven Indian states, the study discusses the challenges hindering the components’ uptake and solutions to address the same.

Key Findings

Component-A: Decentralised solar plants on farmlands

Under this model, farmers can set up solar or other renewable power plants on their land (directly or by leasing out land to developers), and the discom would purchase power from them.

  • Although the component provides long-term economic benefits to discoms, most discoms have surplus contracted capacity and are concerned about the short term disruption in their finances with the additional procurement under Component A.
  • Under the current policy framework, utility-scale power plants have a cost advantage over the distributed power plants due to better economies of scale and exemption from Inter-State Transmission (ISTS) charges.
  • Developers are finding the ceiling tariff set for Component-A by many states unattractive due to multiple risks including poor grid unavailability at the distribution level, and payment default risks of discoms. The recently introduced basic customs duty (BCD) on solar panels and cells are also disproportionately affecting its cost competitiveness.
  • Beyond economics, implementation challenges like delay in land leasing and land conversion approvals stemming from lack of interdepartmental coordination, and difficulties for farmers to access institutional finances are further slowing down the component’s uptake.

A Karnataka discom would gain a net benefit of INR 0.54 for each unit produced from the Component-A power plant over 25 years

Source: Authors’ analysis using VGRS framework developed by Kuldeep et.al. (2019)

Component-C: Grid-connected solar irrigation pumps

Under this model, farmers with existing grid-connected pump sets are eligible for subsidies to solarise their connections, and sell any excess power to the discoms at a predetermined tariff.

  • This model will bear net benefits for all the stakeholders only under limited contexts depending on factors like farmers self-consumption, extant power supply situation and other agro-economic factors.
  • States are finding it difficult to get farmers to shoulder the beneficiary contribution under the scheme (40 per cent) in the backdrop of free or subsidised power for agriculture. However, without farmer contribution, the viability of the model gets severely constrained.
  • In addition, farmers may find the opportunity cost of selling the surplus power high, and prefer to sell water to neighbours or grow more crops (as observed in certain contexts). This would have implications on the financial liability of the discoms and state governments.
  • Implementation challenges such as metering and billing a large number of dispersed connections and managing the non-participant farmers connected to the feeder make the scheme unattractive for discoms.

All three stakeholders would theoretically benefit from Component-C

Source: Authors’ analysis

There is a strong negative correlation between farmer’s income and combined net savings for the government and discom

Source: Authors’ analysis

Key Recommendations

To stimulate the uptake of Component A, we recommend the following measures:

  • The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) should consider extending the scheme’s timeline and converge it with the state-level power procurement planning cycle to enable discoms to effectively participate in the scheme.
  • In consultation with the Forum of Regulators (FoR), MNRE should also prepare a framework for determining the tariff for distributed solar power plants, and consider rationalising the ISTS charges to create a level playing field for distributed power plants.
  • The MNRE should also consider strengthening the compensation clauses for grid unavailability and payment default under PM-KUSUM to reduce the risks for developers.
  • State governments need to adopt innovative financing models like farmer-developer special purpose vehicles to address the financing challenges faced by the farmers.
  • State governments should also form a state-level steering committee to ensure inter-departmental coordination and smooth implementation of the PM-KUSUM.

To support the off-take of grid-connected solarisation model under Component C, we propose the following:

  • Pilot the model in different agro-economic contexts to test its feasibility, identify viable financing structures, and study farmers’ behaviour concerning the use of surplus power.
  • Discoms should lead the implementation as the component will throw up many challenges that only discoms can tackle. For instance, discoms need to identify and adopt solutions like smart meters and smart transformers to tackle challenges on the metering and billing front, while engaging with the farmers to build trust.
  • The MNRE, in consultation with FoR, should prepare a standardised framework in determining a viable tariff for Component-C.
PM-KUSUM holds a massive potential to solarise Indian agriculture and achieve multiple policy objectives. Conducting pilots at scale, campaigns and demonstrations for farmers, and actively seeking on-ground feedback will provide critical ingredients for the scheme’s success.

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

Explore Related Publications