Home
Council on Energy, Environment and Water Integrated | International | Independent

Increasing Climate Investment in Developing Countries: Proposals for the Baku to Belém Roadmap to 1.3T

EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism

REPORT
03 November, 2025 |

HAVE A QUERY?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Why the role of servicing sector is important in sustainable operation of room air-conditioning units?

    Proper servicing and maintenance of RAC units can curtail up to 50 per cent degradation in its performance that happens with time. The servicing sector is also a source of up to 40 per cent of annual refrigerant demand in India. Thus, the ability of the servicing sector to deliver sustainability gains for the RAC sector is significant – it can help deal with refrigerant overuse for servicing, and bring operational energy-efficiency closer to the designed benchmarks.

  • How many skilled technicians will be required in India?

    The current requirement of skilled technicians in India is around 0.35-0.4 million, which will increase to 2 million by 2026-27, and around 5.6 million by 2046-47.

  • Are the good servicing practices beneficial for the end-users of RAC units?

    Yes, the good servicing practices are beneficial for the end-users. It improves the energy efficiency of RACs, reduces the possibility of refrigerant leakages, and enhance the life-span of RAC units. This results in significant savings in the operational cost of RACs.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

REPORT
31 October, 2025 |

HAVE A QUERY?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Why are corporate emissions disclosures important for India’s climate goals?

    The top 1000 listed entities alone account for nearly half of India’s total GHG emissions, making corporate climate action important in the pursuit of national climate goals. Emissions disclosures help improve transparency and data integrity, allowing regulators, investors, and firms to track progress toward net zero. They also help businesses attract sustainable finance, and align their strategies with India’s decarbonisation pathways.

  • What does India’s current emissions disclosures regime look like?

    Emissions disclosures in India currently occur through SEBI’s Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) for the top 1,000 listed companies, and will soon expand under the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS), which will require obligated entities (unit level) to report their GHG emissions. Other regulators such as RBI, IRDAI, and PFRDA are integrating ESG risk disclosures, but any mandates are yet to arrive.

  • How can the harmonisation of emissions monitoring ease reporting burden across different mandates?

    Currently, emissions estimation is undertaken internally by corporates and manually filed into the BRSR report – affecting the credibility of disclosures. Harmonisation of emissions monitoring and data management through digital ESG platforms will help improve the quality, and credibility of reported data, and enable corporates to determine key areas for intervention to improve their ESG performance. Further, as several regulated unit-level entities included under the CCTS belong to companies that are also required to make BRSR filings, digital monitoring can help ease collation of data and subsequent reporting.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

ISSUE BRIEF
30 October, 2025 |

HAVE A QUERY?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is Loss and Damage finance?

    Loss and damage (L&D) finance addresses irreversible impacts of climate change — arising from both slow-onset processes (such as sea-level rise) and extreme weather events (such as cyclones and heatwaves) — where adaptation efforts are no longer sufficient. These impacts cause long-term economic losses (e.g., destruction of infrastructure, homes, and crops) as well as non-economic harms (e.g., cultural loss, displacement, and health impacts). L&D finance supports the ex post activities needed for relief, recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction, with a focus on ensuring that vulnerable communities are not pushed further into crisis due to climate-induced shocks.

  • What is the burden sharing framework used in this study?

    The burden sharing framework applies 11 indicators across responsibility, capability, and vulnerability — with equal weightage — to derive a balanced and evidence-based approach to mobilising and accessing finance. By analysing 150 countries, the framework identifies five differentiated groups that reflect real-world differences across historical emissions, economic readiness, and exposure to climate risks. These results inform which countries can contribute more and which require predictable, grant-based support, while recognising that all three principles remain essential to global equity.

  • Why is vulnerability central to the framework?

    Climate impacts have intensified and expanded to regions with limited historic responsibility and constrained economic capacity. Vulnerability, therefore, captures current and projected harm, reflecting compounding disaster exposure, socioeconomic inequalities, institutional readiness, and climate-driven risks to development. Integrating vulnerability complements responsibility and capability, ensuring that global L&D finance decisions respond to lived realities. This strengthens legitimacy, negotiating leverage for the Global South, and allocation effectiveness within the FRLD.

  • Why is a minimum allocation floor needed?

    Under existing arrangements, contributions to L&D finance remain voluntary, fragmented, and unpredictable, limiting the pace and quality of response. A minimum allocation floor equivalent to 0.08 per cent of GDP operationalises a clear, consistent, and politically rational starting point for developed-country contributions. It enhances predictability, supports long-term planning, and provides a credible basis for negotiations — particularly as the FRLD moves into its disbursement phase in early 2026. The benchmark is also conservative, reflecting the lower-bound of L&D finance needs and aligning with established burden-sharing logic.

  • How does the framework relate to current L&D governance mechanisms?

    The FRLD represents the financial arm of the L&D governance ecosystem, alongside the Warsaw International Mechanism (overarching arm) and the Santiago Network (technical arm). The burden-sharing framework supports efforts to strengthen alignment, clarify mandates, and enable smoother access pathways, especially for the most vulnerable.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

REPORT
28 October, 2025 |

HAVE A QUERY?

author image
Programme Manager, Next Generation India Fellowship

HAVE A QUERY?

author image
Programme Manager, Next Generation India Fellowship

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

REPORT
17 October, 2025 |

HAVE A QUERY?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • How many zero-emission trucks (ZETs) are currently in operation, and what are the future targets and projections?

    As of 2024, only about 600 electric trucks are in operation across India, the majority being heavy-duty trucks (HDTs). To accelerate the deployment, industries and government agencies have signalled demand for around 5,000 ZETs by 2027 and approximately 7,700 ZETs by 2030. These projections are supported by multi-prolonged initiatives, including NITI Aayog’s e-FAST India programme, the Bharat ZET policy Advisory framework with 30 proposed interventions, and the National Green Hydrogen Mission, which provides viability gap funding for alternate fuel vehicles. Despite these efforts, ZET adoption faces headwinds related to technology, infrastructure, costs, and operator perceptions.

  • Why prioritise corridor charging, and why was the Delhi-Agra (NH44) highway route chosen?

    The PM -Edrive initiatives allocate ₹ 11,000 crore, ₹ 2,000 crore as a capital grant for charging infrastructure development. It also sets an aggregate target of 1800 fast chargers (240 kW each) across 20 major truck corridors and 35 national highways, providing the foundation for large- scale ZET adoption. The Delhi-Agra section, NH44, is a strategic freight corridor connecting multiple logistics hubs, warehouses, and industrial zones in Faridabad, Palwal, Hodal, Mathura, Vrindavan, and Agra, as well as to widen NCR. It forms part of both the Amritsar-Kolkata Industrial Corridor (AKIC) and the Golden Quadrilateral, linking east-west and north-south national highway corridors. Recognised as a priority trucking corridor by the Ministry of Heavy Industries (MHI) and a high-traffic corridor by the Ministry of Power (MoP), it carries diverse loads, including time-sensitive perishables, bulk materials, and essential consumption goods. Its consistent truck volumes and travel patterns make it a strong candidate for piloting ZET deployment and planning EVCI.

  • Should India focus on building new charging infrastructure or retrofitting existing facilities?

    The greenfield anchor nodes, which are large centralised charging hubs, are necessary in stretches with sparse existing installations or low-to-moderate site suitability. But these hubs require higher upfront CAPEX; they can be future-proofed through substation upgrades and renewable integration (PV+BESS). Meanwhile, retrofitting and co-locating chargers at fuel stations, warehouses, and logistic parks can expand coverage quickly and cost-effectively along high-suitability stretches. This distributed approach reduces land acquisition needs, accelerates deployment, and mitigates range anxiety. So a hybrid approach with greenfield anchor hubs at sparse existing installations and retrofitted EVCIs at high suitability stretches can provide both throughput and accessibility, anchoring broader ZET rollout.

  • For 30% ZET penetration (around 1000 trucks) on the Delhi-Agra (NH44) highway, how much charging infrastructure would be required?

    To meet the daily charging demand of ~1000 ZETs (30% of truck movements on NH44), two deployment strategies are possible: Anchor node (hub) model: There are about five hubs with 50-75 high-capacity chargers in total. The 240 kW hub option has a higher upfront cost (~ ₹ 77.6 crore) but delivers strong throughput and long-term efficiency. The 350 kW hub option has a slightly lower cost (~ ₹ 66.3 crore) while also maintaining reliability, requiring new 33/11 kV substations and larger land parcels. Distributed network model: About 12 network sites with 36-60 chargers spread along the corridor. The 350 kW network option deployment cost is approximately ₹ 72 crore, offering accessibility at shorter intervals (10-20 km), whereas in the 500 kW network option, there is a slightly lower cost of ₹ 56 crore but with risks of underutilisation and demand fragmentation. In short, 5 hubs (240/350 kW) or 12 distributed sites (350/500 kW) could support 1,000 ZETs. The hub model is CAPEX-heavy but efficient for long-term GHG abatement, while the distributed network improves accessibility, redundancy and early adoption.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

PAPER
15 October, 2025 |

HAVE A QUERY?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)?

    The CBAM is a policy by the European Union that puts a carbon price on certain imported goods—like steel, aluminium, and cement—to prevent “carbon leakage” and ensure fair competition with EU industries that already pay for carbon emissions.

  • Why is CBAM important for India?

    As one of the EU’s key trading partners, India’s exports—especially from energy-intensive industries—may face higher costs under CBAM. This policy could influence India’s trade competitiveness, industrial decarbonisation, and climate policy direction.

  • What are the main findings of the study?

    The study identifies four dominant themes shaping India’s CBAM discourse: (1) carbon pricing, (2) monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV), (3) trade and political implications, and (4) fairness, equity, and trust in global climate governance.

  • How can India respond to CBAM?

    India can strengthen its domestic carbon pricing through the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS), build a unified MRV framework, and negotiate for fairer timelines, technology transfer, and revenue-sharing in EU–India discussions.

  • What challenges do Indian exporters face under CBAM?

    Many exporters—especially MSMEs—lack the data systems, technical know-how, and financial capacity to measure and report emissions as per EU rules, making compliance costly and complex.

  • What does the study recommend for policymakers?

    Policymakers should integrate robust carbon pricing, capacity-building for industries, and international cooperation on technology and finance to reduce CBAM risks and turn it into a driver for India’s low-carbon industrial growth.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

ISSUE BRIEF
14 October, 2025 |

HAVE A QUERY?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What are burnt area indices?

    Burnt area indices are satellite data-based indicators that detect burnt fields by identifying changes in field characteristics before and after burning.

  • What are the limitations of remote sensing-based CRB monitoring?

    Satellite-borne sensors can only detect active fires during the overpass. Coarse spatial and temporal resolution, obstruction due to clouds and smoke, are also challenges associated with remote sensing-based CRB monitoring.

  • What is the difference between partial and complete burning of fields?

    In complete burning, the entire leftover straw after harvesting is set on fire, whereas in partial burning, only the loose straw left after running the harvester is burnt.

  • What are the implications of accurately monitoring CRB?

    An accurate estimate of the extent of CRB helps assess the effectiveness of CRB mitigation policies. It will also help improve the emission estimates from CRB. In turn, this will lead to improvements in the performance of air quality models that run on these estimates.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

ISSUE BRIEF
07 October, 2025 |

HAVE A QUERY?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What does COP Presidency mean?

    The COP Presidency is the country hosting the annual UN Climate Conference. It leads agenda- setting, builds consensus among Parties, and mobilises countries for cooperative action. Presidencies act as key orchestrators of global climate diplomacy, shaping negotiations and launching initiatives that complement the Paris Agreement’s long-term goals.

  • What are cooperative climate initiatives?

    Cooperative climate initiatives are voluntary partnerships among governments, organisations, and non-state actors. They accelerate climate action beyond national commitments through collaboration on mitigation, adaptation, finance, and technology. Examples like the International Solar Alliance and Cool Coalition show how collective action complements formal UNFCCC processes.

  • What is the Global Climate Action Agenda?

    The Global Climate Action Agenda, framed as the fourth pillar of the Paris Agreement, promotes voluntary multi-actor initiatives that complement official negotiations. It mobilises diverse actors—governments, businesses, and civil society—to advance climate solutions, ensuring that implementation matches ambition across sectors and countries beyond COP discussions.

  • Who are the actors in cooperative climate initiatives?

    Actors include national and subnational governments, international organisations, multilateral development banks, investors, private companies, and NGOs. Their collective engagement drives innovation, finance, and implementation.

  • What is the difference between orchestration and participation mobilised?

    Orchestration refers to leadership and coordination—typically by COP Presidencies or lead countries—guiding and aligning climate initiatives. Participation mobilised measures the number of countries or actors engaged in these initiatives.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

Pages