Home
Council on Energy, Environment and Water Integrated | International | Independent
Suresh Prabhu

Suresh Prabhu

Dr Suresh Prabhu has held 10 important cabinet portfolios at the federal level in the Government of India including Industry, Power, Environment & Forest, Railways, Civil Aviation, Commerce & Industry, Fertilizers & Chemicals. He has also served as the Prime Minister’s Sherpa to the G7 & G20.

Dr Suresh Prabhu is the Founding Chancellor of Rishihood University, Chairman for drafting committee for National Cooperation Policy and an active visiting Professor of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

He has been featured amongst the top three Indian leaders of the future in the cover story, 'Giant on the Move' of the Hong Kong-based Asia week Magazine. He was declared 'Best Member of Parliament in the 13th Lok Sabha'. He also ranked 2nd best performing Minister in India Today’s report.

He has been a member of the United Nations Commission for Biodiversity and Land-use Change, and the Global Advisory Council of the World Economic Forum.

Dialogue
Shifting Behaviours for Mitigating Agriculture Residue Burning at Scale

16 Jun 2026   |   1000–1400 IST

The Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) is pleased to invite you to the dialogue on ‘Shifting Behaviours for Mitigating Agriculture Residue Burning at Scale’ on 16 June 2026, 1000–1400 IST, at The Oberoi, New Delhi.

Air pollution in India is a multisectoral challenge, driven by emissions from transport, industry, agriculture, and the residential sector. While regulatory and technological solutions have received considerable attention, behaviour change remains an underutilised yet powerful lever for driving sustained, on-ground action. Translating awareness into lasting shifts in practice — whether among farmers, residents or industry actors — requires targeted, evidence-based behavioural and communication strategies that are context-sensitive and measurable. This event will bring together practitioners, researchers, and policymakers working on behavioural interventions across key pollution-contributing sectors to examine cross-cutting lessons and build a shared agenda for scaling behaviour change as a tool for air quality improvement.

As part of this event, CEEW will launch its report "Behaviour Change Approaches to Tackle Stubble Burning at Scale: Reimagining Crop Residue Management", which presents evidence-based insights from field on the design and effectiveness of communication interventions targeting stubble burning in Punjab, India. The findings offer actionable guidance for policymakers, agricultural agencies, communications professionals and civil society organisations on designing targeted campaigns that move communities from awareness to action.

For Event Queries

Yadu Kathuria

Senior Communications Associate

[email protected]

REPORT
04 June, 2026 |

HAVE A QUERY?

author image
Programme Associate

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Does a rooftop solar system require a lot of maintenance?

    No, rooftop solar systems require minimal maintenance; periodic cleaning (Preferably biweekly) and basic inspections to ensure optimal performance are usually sufficient.

  • What measures and precautions to maintain the rooftop solar system?

    Schedule maintenance during early morning or near sunset to avoid disrupting generation. Clean panels using water and a soft microfibre cloth, preferably low-mineral water. Avoid abrasive cleaners or pressure washers, and do not climb or stand on panels.

  • How to monitor rooftop solar generation?

    A solar meter usually records your solar generation, but its installation depends on your state and electricity service provider. Additionally, a smart inverter can also track your solar generation and is generally connected to a mobile app via Wi-Fi for real-time monitoring.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

author image
Programme Associate

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

REPORT
04 June, 2026 |

HAVE A QUERY?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Why is residential rooftop solar important for India's energy transition?

    Residential rooftop solar helps households generate electricity at the point of consumption, reducing pressure on the grid while contributing to India's clean energy and Net Zero goals. During India's peak electricity demand of 270.7 GW on 21 May 2026, solar energy contributed about 22 per cent of the country's power needs.

  • What are the average electricity bill savings of rooftop solar adopters in India?

    Based on the survey findings, rooftop solar adopters in India are experiencing an average bill reduction of ~71 per cent, which amounts to more than INR Three Lakh savings in electricity bills over the lifespan of the system (25 years).

  • What is the biggest barrier to rooftop solar adoption?

    The report finds that the largest opportunity lies in helping households move from interest to action. Many households are aware of rooftop solar and willing to adopt it, but face challenges related to information, procedural complexity, trusted guidance, and financing awareness. Among all the households that are aware of residential rooftop solar, only 52 per cent are aware of the national scheme on RTS, Pradhan Mantri Surya Ghar: Muft Bijli Yojana.

  • How was the survey conducted?

    The study was conducted through a telephonic survey of 17,094 households across 21 states and 1 union territory, representing 98 per cent of India's population, making it one of the largest consumer-focused studies on residential RTS conducted post PMSGY in India.

  • Which households are most likely to adopt rooftop solar today?

    Current adoption is concentrated among affluent urban households with elevated electricity consumption. However, the study identifies substantial untapped demand across other household segments, alongside high satisfaction levels regarding electricity bill savings and overall rooftop solar performance across all categories.

  • Are there financial support mechanisms for installing rooftop solar in India?

    Rooftop solar adoption is primarily facilitated by the PM Surya Ghar scheme, which offers capacity-based subsidies alongside low-interest, collateral-free financing for consumers requiring additional financial support. Additionally, a few states provide supplementary state-level subsidies and incentives to further accelerate adoption.

  • How can policymakers and DISCOMs accelerate rooftop solar adoption?

    The survey highlights the importance of trust-based outreach and peer learning. Government departments are the most trusted source of information for 71 per cent of households, while over 90 per cent of adopters report positive experiences and 87 per cent are willing to recommend their vendors. Leveraging trusted institutions and satisfied adopters can help convert awareness into large-scale adoption.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

REPORT
03 June, 2026 |

HAVE A QUERY?

author image
Programme Associate

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What kinds of jobs does the renewable energy sector create?

    Clean energy jobs span the entire project lifecycle — from manufacturing components like solar modules and wind turbines, to deploying and installing systems in the field, to operating and maintaining assets over decades. Each phase requires a different mix of skills: construction and installation work is relatively labour-intensive and employs semi-skilled workers; manufacturing increasingly demands precision and technical training; and operations rely on a smaller but steadier workforce. Beyond these, clean energy also generates jobs in areas like logistics, project finance, and community engagement.

  • Which renewable energy technology creates the most jobs in India?

    It depends on whether you measure total jobs or jobs per megawatt. In absolute terms, large-scale solar dominates simply because of deployment volume. But in terms of labour intensity per MW, rooftop solar, solar pumps, and bioenergy are significantly more employment-intensive — making them particularly valuable for rural and distributed employment goals. It is because one needs to deploy more systems for a distributed technology to reach the same capacity. More systems need more people and create more jobs.

  • What kinds of skills does India's clean energy sector actually need?

    The clean energy sector requires a mix of low-skilled, semi-skilled, and highly-skilled workers, with the distribution varying by technology and phase. Manufacturing in solar and wind is particularly skewed towards semi- and highly-skilled workers — for precision assembly, quality control, and systems integration. Deployment phases have a higher share of low- to semi-skilled labour, particularly for civil, electrical, and installation work.

  • What does "full-time equivalent employment" mean, and why do we need them?

    A full-time equivalent (FTE) is a standardised measure that converts variable, part-time, or project-based work into comparable units of one full-time job for one year. Clean energy projects are cyclical — they require intensive labour during construction and much less during operations. Using FTEs, rather than raw headcounts, allows for meaningful comparison of employment intensity across technologies, project sizes, and project phases. This study develops India-specific FTE employment coefficients based on primary survey data from industry — a significant methodological contribution, given that most global studies rely on coefficients derived from other countries.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

author image
Programme Associate

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

REPORT
29 May, 2026 | ,

HAVE A QUERY?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is OFMSW and why does it matter?

    The organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) includes kitchen waste, market waste (vegetables, fruits, meat, and flowers), and horticulture waste. It constitutes roughly 50 per cent of all MSW generated in Indian cities. Effective management of OFMSW can halve the overall waste burden, recover valuable resources such as biogas and compost, reduce methane emissions, and improve the quality of other recyclable materials like paper and plastic.

  • What are the main technologies used to process organic waste in India?

    The two primary methods are composting and biomethanation. Composting converts organic waste into nutrient-rich compost that can substitute chemical fertilisers. Biomethanation is an anaerobic process that produces biogas (and, when purified further, compressed biogas or CBG), which can be used for cooking, electricity generation, or as a transport fuel.

  • What are the three scenarios studied in this report, and how do they differ?

    The report models three scenarios for India by 2047. The Business-as-Usual (BAU) scenario assumes the current situation, with 90 per cent waste collection and only half the waste processed. The Accelerated Policy Scenario (APS) targets full collection and 95 per cent processing, with an equal split between composting and biomethanation. The Ambitious Green Transition Scenario (AGTS) assumes 100 per cent collection and processing, with a greater emphasis on biomethanation (66 per cent) over composting (34 per cent).

  • What are the biggest barriers to scaling organic waste management in India?

    The report identifies six key challenge areas: weak enforcement of waste management rules and delays in project approvals; technology mismatches and feedstock quality issues due to poor source segregation; limited financial capacity of urban local bodies and challenges in attracting private investment; staff shortages and low technical capacity within municipalities; lack of up-to-date waste data, i.e., waste characterisation; and low public awareness and the "not in my backyard" (NIMBY) effect when setting up treatment plants.

  • What role does source segregation play, and why is it so critical?

    Source segregation, which means separating the wet (organic) waste from the dry waste at the household level, forms the foundation of the entire system of organic waste management. Without clean, segregated feedstock, both composting and biomethanation plants underperform or fail in the long run. Cities like Indore have demonstrated that nearly 100 per cent source segregation is achievable and directly enables high-quality end products and financially viable plants. Poor segregation is cited as one of the most common reasons plants become defunct.

  • What is the economic and jobs potential of scaling organic waste management?

    The economic potential varies significantly depending on policy ambition. The accelerated policy scenario could unlock a USD 50.6 billion market and mobilise USD 24.3 billion in investment by 2047, while creating the highest number of direct jobs at 2.6 million. The ambitious green transition scenario unlocks an even larger market of USD 61.5 billion and USD 30.2 billion in investment, but generates fewer direct jobs at 1.9 million, as biomethanation is more automated and capital-intensive than composting.

  • What is the emissions impact of better organic waste management?

    The waste sector overall is currently one of the fastest-growing contributors to India's greenhouse gas emissions, having grown by 226 per cent between 1994 and 2020. Under a business-as-usual approach, emissions from the organic waste could reach nearly 120 MtCO2e by 2047. Under the accelerated policy scenario and the ambitious green transition scenario, the sector could achieve net-negative emissions of 67.5 MtCO2e and 100.5 MtCO2e, respectively. This is achieved by diverting waste away from dumpsites and using end-products such as biogas and compost to displace fossil fuels in sectors like transport and industry, and reduce dependence on chemical fertilisers in agriculture.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

REPORT
26 May, 2026 |

HAVE A QUERY?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Why is strengthening domestic solar cell manufacturing critical for India?

    Expanding domestic cell manufacturing would ensure supply chain resilience and higher domestic value addition – solar cells contribute nearly 60 per cent of the total module cost. By scaling up, reducing manufacturing costs, and accelerating technology adoption, India's solar cell manufacturing can support both domestic energy transition and build a globally competitive solar ecosystem.

  • What factors drive up domestic solar cell manufacturing costs?

    Import duties on silver paste drive up consumable costs. Lack of economies of scale and limited access to subsidised infrastructure drive up capital expenditure. These two factors together lead to higher manufacturing costs.

  • What technological challenges do domestic solar cell manufacturers face?

    Domestic manufacturers are dependent on imported equipment. This results in manufacturers remaining dependent on the know-how required to carry out installation and process optimisation. This results in slower commissioning of facilities for newer advanced cell technologies such as TOPCon. The lack of know-how also results in limited ability to upskill process engineers and technicians, who are critical for scaling up cell manufacturing capacities. In addition, weak public and private solar R&D leads to constraints in the timely adoption of next-generation technologies.

  • What interventions can help Indian solar cell manufacturing become competitive?

    Establishing shared manufacturing infrastructure to reduce utility costs, localise equipment, and shared pilot-scale R&D facilities would be essential to become cost and technology-competitive. Further, targeted capital subsidies, developing dedicated skilling programmes, and strategic technology transfers would complement these measures.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

REPORT
25 May, 2026 |

HAVE A QUERY?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • How does CO₂ pipeline transport work?

    CO₂ is captured at the source (such as a power plant or steel mill), compressed to a supercritical state above its critical temperature and pressure, and transported through dedicated pipelines to a storage site. In the supercritical state, CO₂ behaves as a compressible fluid, enabling efficient high-volume transport. The pipeline network consists of large-diameter trunk pipelines, carrying CO₂ from major source areas to major sink areas, and smaller-diameter spur pipelines, connecting individual sources or sinks to the trunk pipelines. Pumping stations are installed at regular intervals (typically every 150 km) to maintain pressure throughout the system.

  • What is right-of-way (RoW) and why is it a challenge for CO₂ pipelines in India?

    Right-of-way (RoW) refers to the legal authorisation granted to a project to build and maintain infrastructure on a continuous strip of land. In India, obtaining RoW for a new pipeline requires land acquisition, compensation negotiations with landowners, and regulatory approvals across multiple jurisdictions, often delaying projects by several years. Obtaining permissions to lay pipelines through forest areas, defence lands, coastal regulation zones, and government-owned lands can each take a year or more. This study proposes using the existing RoW of NG pipelines to lay new CO₂ pipelines in parallel, which would significantly reduce these barriers.

  • What is the estimated cost of transporting CO₂ through a pipeline network in India?

    This study estimates that the cost of transporting CO₂ through a pipeline network using the RoW of existing NG pipelines ranges from USD 0.70 to USD 4.19 per tonne of CO₂, depending on the emission sources included and the storage sites used. Saline aquifer-only scenarios are the least expensive (USD 0.70–2.16 per tonne), while basalt-only scenarios are the most expensive (USD 2.89–4.19 per tonne). These transport costs are relatively low compared with capture costs, which typically range from USD 30 to USD 100 per tonne, and represent a small fraction of the total CCS chain cost.

  • What policies are needed to enable carbon capture and storage in India?

    Several regulatory and policy actions are required. First, India currently lacks a national CCS policy, and identifying the ministry that will own the mandate is a crucial first step. Second, the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962, needs to be amended to allow CO₂ pipelines to use existing NG and petroleum pipeline RoWs, and to enable the acquisition of new RoW for CO₂ pipelines. Third, a regulatory authority needs to be established to oversee infrastructure development and safeguard public interests. Finally, an assessment of how much of the existing RoW across NG, crude oil, and petroleum product pipelines can accommodate new CO₂ pipelines is urgently required.

  • What is carbon capture and storage (CCS)?

    Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a technology that captures CO₂ emissions from industrial facilities or power plants, compresses them into a supercritical state, and transports them through pipelines to underground geological formations for permanent storage. Suitable storage formations include saline aquifers, basalt formations, and depleted oil and gas fields. CCS is widely recognised as an essential tool for achieving net-zero emissions, particularly for sectors where alternative decarbonisation pathways are limited or prohibitively expensive.

  • Why does India need CCS to achieve its net-zero target?

    India has committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2070. However, the energy transition will take several decades, during which fossil fuel-based power plants and heavy industries will continue to emit CO₂. CCS is essential for addressing these residual emissions, particularly from hard-to-abate sectors such as iron and steel, cement, and aluminium, where process emissions cannot be fully eliminated through energy efficiency or renewable energy alone. CEEW modelling indicates that CCS could reduce India’s economic losses by 23 per cent between 2030 and 2050 and by 32 per cent between 2050 and 2100, and could mitigate nearly 60 per cent of emissions from these sectors.

  • What is the difference between carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon capture and utilisation (CCU)?

    CCS involves permanently storing captured CO₂ in deep geological formations underground, while carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) converts captured CO₂ into useful products such as fuels, chemicals, or construction materials. CCS is generally more cost-effective for large-scale emissions reduction, since underground storage is significantly cheaper than the processes required for utilisation. However, CCU can offer economic co-benefits through the sale of derived products. Both approaches are complementary, and India’s decarbonisation pathway may need to deploy both, with CCS handling the bulk of industrial and power sector emissions.

  • What geological formations are suitable for CO₂ storage in India?

    India has three main types of onshore geological formations suitable for CO₂ storage. Saline aquifers (144 GtCO₂ capacity) are geographically widespread and are the least expensive storage option due to their proximity to emission sources. Basalt formations (170 GtCO₂ capacity) are concentrated primarily in Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, and adjoining states. Oil and gas fields and coal formations have a comparatively limited storage potential. Together, India’s total onshore storage potential is estimated at approximately 317 GtCO₂, which far exceeds the country’s projected cumulative emissions over the coming decades.

  • Why is CO₂ storage in basalt formations considered particularly safe?

    Basalt formations have a unique geochemical property: when CO₂ is injected into basalt, it reacts with the rock to form solid mineral carbonates over time, a process known as mineral carbonation. This converts the gaseous CO₂ into a stable solid form, virtually eliminating the risk of long-term leakage. Although transport costs to basalt formations are higher due to their geographic concentration, the significantly lower post-injection monitoring and leakage-risk costs may make basalt storage more economical over the full project lifecycle.

  • What are hard-to-abate sectors and why do they need CCS?

    Hard-to-abate sectors are industries in which decarbonisation is technically difficult or prohibitively expensive using current technologies. These include iron and steel, cement, aluminium, and chemicals. A large share of their emissions arises from chemical processes rather than from energy use alone, meaning that switching to renewable energy does not eliminate these process emissions. CCS is currently one of the few viable options for addressing process emissions at scale. India’s iron and steel and cement plants alone account for approximately 480 million tonnes of CO₂ per annum that could potentially be captured and stored underground.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

OTHER PUBLICATIONS
22 May, 2026 |

HAVE A QUERY?

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

REPORT
21 May, 2026 |

HAVE A QUERY?

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What are open access charges, and why do they exist?

    When C&I consumers buy electricity from the discom, the tariff they pay covers not just the cost of power but also network maintenance, cross-subsidy for agricultural and domestic consumers, backup capacity, and grid balancing. When these consumers switch to open access and buy power directly from a renewable energy generator, the discom needs to be compensated for some revenue loss (cross-subsidy, and stranded power purchase cost) and services such as grid balancing, backup arrangements. Open access charges compensate discoms for these continuing costs. Six charges apply: cross-subsidy surcharge (CSS), additional surcharge (AS), standby charge, banking charge, parallel operation charge (POC), and wheeling charge.

  • What is energy banking, and why does it matter for renewable energy?

    Solar power generates most electricity during midday hours, but consumers need power throughout the day, including evenings. Banking allows RE generators to inject surplus power into the grid during the day and withdraw an equivalent amount later. The discom effectively acts as a virtual grid battery. This service has a cost: the discom backs down thermal generation during injection (while still paying fixed charges to generators) and procures replacement power from the market during peak withdrawal hours. Banking charges are meant to recover these costs, but most states either cap the charge or restrict banking volumes rather than pricing the service to reflect actual costs.

  • Why are tariff reforms and open access charges linked?

    Several open access charges exist because underlying tariffs are not cost-reflective, and different reforms affect different charges. CSS exists because C&I tariffs exceed the average cost of supply; as states align the two, the cross-subsidy shrinks, and CSS should fall. AS exists because discoms recover most fixed costs through energy charges; if tariffs were rebalanced toward higher fixed charges, discoms would recover these costs regardless of migration, making AS redundant. Banking charges arise from the mismatch between RE generation and consumption timing; as time-of-day tariffs mature, consumers face signals to align consumption with generation, reducing banking volumes and associated costs. In each case, the open access charge is a symptom of a tariff design problem, not a solution to it.

  • What is driving C&I consumers to procure renewable energy beyond cost savings?

    Several regulatory and market forces are converging. The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism will impose costs on carbon-intensive exports of steel, cement, aluminium, and fertilisers. SEBI’s BRSR framework makes emissions disclosure mandatory for top-listed companies. The GHG Protocol Scope 2 revision proposes hourly matching for reporting, which means companies will need to demonstrate clean energy procurement at a granular level. Sustainability-linked loans tie borrowing costs to emission reduction targets. And multinational supply-chain mandates, such as Apple’s commitment to a 100 per cent carbon-neutral supply chain, require verified renewable procurement from Indian suppliers. Together, these pressures are transforming RE procurement from a cost-driven choice into a compliance and competitiveness requirement.

  •  

HAVE A QUERY?

Sign up for the latest on our pioneering research

Pages